What's Your World View?

Posted By: Adam 1 Comments
So there's this World View quiz, that plots out your tendancy to agree with science vs. superstition, and progress vs. extermination on a 2-D graph; based on your answers to 23 questions. I don't really like how they use the term "extermination" – sounds a little leftist to me – but I didn't come up with it, I'm just passing it along.

For the record, I scored [spoiler]9/10 science, 10/10 progress – just one point shy (in science) of tieing Carl Sagan. And I think I was denied that point because I chose B ("they do work and are more than a placebo") for the magnet therapy and homeopathy question. I even looked up exactly what homeopathy was so that I could give a good answer, but  they both seem to be based on science to me and I guess it was counted as slightly superstitious. Perhaps "None of the above" would have been a more appropriate answer, since I don't feel strongly either way.[/spoiler]

I'm curious how you would score. I would be lying if I said I hadn't already thought about it and predicted what some of you would score based on how I think you view the world… that's just the way the human mind works.

So if you're not too chicken, take a few moments to take the quiz, and leave a comment with your score. I wonder how well I know your world view.

I also disagree with where they place George W. Bush – but they don't say whether each of these individuals has answered all of the questions in the quiz (or otherwise implied them via policy, as I would assume W has), or if they were just darts thrown in the dark.

How much can you tell from 23 questions, anyway? It's obviously not that comprehensive, but fun nonetheless.

1 response to “What's Your World View?”

  1. I sent you an email so we can discuss at length some of the stuff that I'm sure just put a few people to sleep already. <br />
    <br />
    Long story short: You're a smart dude and I'm secretly (<em>secret's out! oh no!)</em> kind of proud inside that I provoked the thought.<br />
    <br />
    While I agree that present technology, as well as what we know about future technology indicates that life beyond Earth is improbable if not impossible - I think the root of the question was more about whether you would prefer that mankind find a way to become extra-terrestrial - once the Earth can no longer support life - or if you think it's better for the race to perish and the cycle to continue without us (or begin anew).<br />
    <br />
    So while <em>I know</em> that <em>I don't know</em> if, when, or how it would be possible to continue life in a time when Earth is a memory not unlike Babe Ruth or The Beatles - my hopes are that somewhere, last week, last month, last year - maybe next year - some savant was/is born that will provide the paradigm shift that will change our entire understanding of space versus time. IE: Just because we can't figure it out, or even imagine its possibility - doesn't mean it's impossible. And I like to think that I'm just smart enough to know that I'm not smart enough to figure out how the heck it'll work. I do kind of revel in the notion that it could be my grandchildren, or maybe their grandchildren, that are among the first generation to live Post-Earth.<br />
    <br />
    But for now, we'll have to take what we can get from Arnold Schwarzenegger and Steven Hawking and see if we can't enjoy the idea.

    Adam

    Adam ~ Aug 4, 2008 at 9:56 PM