Why I'm Good At My Job
I could just write one sentence that says, "I'm very literal-minded, which makes it easier for me to understand (a) why computers act the way they do, and (b) how to bend them to my will;" but that would be a very short blog entry and I don't think anyone would enjoy reading it. Alternatively, I could tell you a story about how this way of thinking has led to some awkward moments. What do you think? I knew you would see it my way.
The very first time I remember a doctor — or for that matter, anyone — asking me to pee in a cup, I was very young. Too young to remember how old I was, but I'm guessing I was less than 10. At least, I won't admit to being any older. But I do remember this much. His instructions were to go into the bathroom, where I would find a stack of cups on the back of the commode. There, I should pee in a cup, and bring it back to him. Simple enough, right?
Being so young, naïve, and literal-minded, I tried to follow his instructions as carefully as I could. I went to the bathroom, found the cups — right where he said they would be — and started to… erm, do my business, as it were. Then something unexpected happened. The cup started to fill up. And I still had plenty more to go. What's a boy to do?
I did my best to pinch it off, set the cup down, procure a new cup, and start … err… using it in a single graceful motion. I don't remember if I spilled or sprayed at all, but I wouldn't be surprised at either, and neither is the point of this story. As I finished filling the second cup I reasoned that I could only carry two, and if that wasn't enough for the doctor, he would just have to make do. (Maybe this is where the expression, "Thinking on your feet" came from?) I finished my business in its normal receptacle, and proudly carried two cups full of my urine back into the little room where my mom and the doctor were waiting for me.
Sadly, I don't think I even knew enough at the time to know that I should be embarrassed when they were amused at what I had done.
All I did was follow instructions. When the situation's scope went outside the scope of the instructions, I tried to infer what the best course of action was. He didn't explicitly say that he only needed an inch or so in the bottom of the first cup, so I had no choice but to assume that he needed as much as I could offer.
So many years later, I realize that not all kids think this way, so I understand why he might not have felt it necessary to explicitly define the amount he needed… but a mark on the side of the cup or some additional instructions couldn't have hurt.
Am I sure that the reason I filled 2 cups is the same reason I'm a good computer programmer? No, I'm not a psychologist. But it seems logical to me.
Recent Comments